Mallikarjuna Chilakala’s Post

𝗦𝗼𝗳𝘁𝘄𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗔𝗿𝗰𝗵𝗶𝘁𝗲𝗰𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗲 𝗣𝗮𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗻𝘀: 𝗠𝗩𝗖, 𝗠𝗩𝗣, 𝗠𝗩𝗜, 𝗠𝗩𝗩𝗠, 𝗩𝗜𝗣𝗘𝗥 Design patterns are essential tools for any developer, offering a framework for structuring code in a clean, maintainable, and scalable way. Today, we'll delve into five of the most popular design patterns, exploring their strengths and weaknesses to help you choose the right fit for your next project. 𝗠𝗩𝗖 (𝗠𝗼𝗱𝗲𝗹-𝗩𝗶𝗲𝘄-𝗖𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗿𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗲𝗿): - Classic pattern separating code into three layers:     - 𝗠𝗼𝗱𝗲𝗹: Data and business logic     - 𝗩𝗶𝗲𝘄: Presentation of data to the user     - 𝗖𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗿𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗲𝗿: Handles user input and updates model/view - Simple and familiar, but can lead to tightly coupled components in complex applications. 𝗠𝗩𝗣 (𝗠𝗼𝗱𝗲𝗹-𝗩𝗶𝗲𝘄-𝗣𝗿𝗲𝘀𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗿): - Introduces a Presenter to mediate between view and model. - Improves separation of concerns and testability. - Requires additional boilerplate code compared to MVC. 𝗠𝗩𝗜 (𝗠𝗼𝗱𝗲𝗹-𝗩𝗶𝗲𝘄-𝗜𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗻𝘁): - Built for reactive programming. - View emits intents, handled by the model, updating state and view. - Promotes unidirectional data flow and simplifies UI logic. - May require a steeper learning curve. 𝗠𝗩𝗩𝗠 (𝗠𝗼𝗱𝗲𝗹-𝗩𝗶𝗲𝘄-𝗩𝗶𝗲𝘄𝗠𝗼𝗱𝗲𝗹): - View binds to a ViewModel holding data and display logic. - ViewModel updates by the model, then updates the view. - Well-suited for reactive frameworks and complex UIs. - Requires additional ViewModel setup compared to MVP. 𝗩𝗜𝗣𝗘𝗥 (𝗩𝗶𝗲𝘄, 𝗜𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗮𝗰𝘁𝗼𝗿, 𝗣𝗿𝗲𝘀𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗿, 𝗘𝗻𝘁𝗶𝘁𝘆, 𝗥𝗼𝘂𝘁𝗲𝗿): - Designed for large and complex applications. - Five layers: View, Interactor (business logic), Presenter (data preparation), Entity (data models), Router (data flow coordination). - Enhances modularity and maintainability for massive projects. - Requires meticulous planning and understanding due to its complexity. 𝗖𝗵𝗼𝗼𝘀𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗥𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁 𝗣𝗮𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗻: The optimal pattern depends on various factors, including: - 𝗣𝗿𝗼𝗷𝗲𝗰𝘁 𝘀𝗶𝘇𝗲 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗽𝗹𝗲𝘅𝗶𝘁𝘆: MVC/MVP for simple apps, MVI/MVVM for reactive apps, VIPER for large projects. - 𝗧𝗲𝗮𝗺 𝗲𝘅𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲: Choose a pattern familiar to your team to avoid learning curves. - 𝗣𝗲𝗿𝘀𝗼𝗻𝗮𝗹 𝗽𝗿𝗲𝗳𝗲𝗿𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲: Experiment and find what works best for you and your team. Ultimately, experimenting and finding what works best for you and your team is key. What do you think? Which software architecture pattern is your favorite?

𝗦𝗼𝗳𝘁𝘄𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗔𝗿𝗰𝗵𝗶𝘁𝗲𝗰𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗲 𝗣𝗮𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗻𝘀: 𝗠𝗩𝗖, 𝗠𝗩𝗣, 𝗠𝗩𝗜, 𝗠𝗩𝗩𝗠, 𝗩𝗜𝗣𝗘𝗥 Design patterns are essential tools for any developer, offering a framework for structuring code in a clean, maintainable, and scalable way. Today, we'll delve into five of the most popular design patterns, exploring their strengths and weaknesses to help you choose the right fit for your next project. 𝗠𝗩𝗖 (𝗠𝗼𝗱𝗲𝗹-𝗩𝗶𝗲𝘄-𝗖𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗿𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗲𝗿): - Classic pattern separating code into three layers:     - 𝗠𝗼𝗱𝗲𝗹: Data and business logic     - 𝗩𝗶𝗲𝘄: Presentation of data to the user     - 𝗖𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗿𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗲𝗿: Handles user input and updates model/view - Simple and familiar, but can lead to tightly coupled components in complex applications. 𝗠𝗩𝗣 (𝗠𝗼𝗱𝗲𝗹-𝗩𝗶𝗲𝘄-𝗣𝗿𝗲𝘀𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗿): - Introduces a Presenter to mediate between view and model. - Improves separation of concerns and testability. - Requires additional boilerplate code compared to MVC. 𝗠𝗩𝗜 (𝗠𝗼𝗱𝗲𝗹-𝗩𝗶𝗲𝘄-𝗜𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗻𝘁): - Built for reactive programming. - View emits intents, handled by the model, updating state and view. - Promotes unidirectional data flow and simplifies UI logic. - May require a steeper learning curve. 𝗠𝗩𝗩𝗠 (𝗠𝗼𝗱𝗲𝗹-𝗩𝗶𝗲𝘄-𝗩𝗶𝗲𝘄𝗠𝗼𝗱𝗲𝗹): - View binds to a ViewModel holding data and display logic. - ViewModel updates by the model, then updates the view. - Well-suited for reactive frameworks and complex UIs. - Requires additional ViewModel setup compared to MVP. 𝗩𝗜𝗣𝗘𝗥 (𝗩𝗶𝗲𝘄, 𝗜𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗮𝗰𝘁𝗼𝗿, 𝗣𝗿𝗲𝘀𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗿, 𝗘𝗻𝘁𝗶𝘁𝘆, 𝗥𝗼𝘂𝘁𝗲𝗿): - Designed for large and complex applications. - Five layers: View, Interactor (business logic), Presenter (data preparation), Entity (data models), Router (data flow coordination). - Enhances modularity and maintainability for massive projects. - Requires meticulous planning and understanding due to its complexity. 𝗖𝗵𝗼𝗼𝘀𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗥𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁 𝗣𝗮𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗻: The optimal pattern depends on various factors, including: - 𝗣𝗿𝗼𝗷𝗲𝗰𝘁 𝘀𝗶𝘇𝗲 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗽𝗹𝗲𝘅𝗶𝘁𝘆: MVC/MVP for simple apps, MVI/MVVM for reactive apps, VIPER for large projects. - 𝗧𝗲𝗮𝗺 𝗲𝘅𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲: Choose a pattern familiar to your team to avoid learning curves. - 𝗣𝗲𝗿𝘀𝗼𝗻𝗮𝗹 𝗽𝗿𝗲𝗳𝗲𝗿𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲: Experiment and find what works best for you and your team. Ultimately, experimenting and finding what works best for you and your team is key. What do you think? Which software architecture pattern is your favorite?

𝗦𝗼𝗳𝘁𝘄𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗔𝗿𝗰𝗵𝗶𝘁𝗲𝗰𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗲 𝗣𝗮𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗻𝘀: 𝗠𝗩𝗖, 𝗠𝗩𝗣, 𝗠𝗩𝗜, 𝗠𝗩𝗩𝗠, 𝗩𝗜𝗣𝗘𝗥 Design patterns are essential tools for any developer, offering a framework for structuring code in a clean, maintainable, and scalable way. Today, we'll delve into five of the most popular design patterns, exploring their strengths and weaknesses to help you choose the right fit for your next project. 𝗠𝗩𝗖 (𝗠𝗼𝗱𝗲𝗹-𝗩𝗶𝗲𝘄-𝗖𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗿𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗲𝗿): - Classic pattern separating code into three layers:     - 𝗠𝗼𝗱𝗲𝗹: Data and business logic     - 𝗩𝗶𝗲𝘄: Presentation of data to the user     - 𝗖𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗿𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗲𝗿: Handles user input and updates model/view - Simple and familiar, but can lead to tightly coupled components in complex applications. 𝗠𝗩𝗣 (𝗠𝗼𝗱𝗲𝗹-𝗩𝗶𝗲𝘄-𝗣𝗿𝗲𝘀𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗿): - Introduces a Presenter to mediate between view and model. - Improves separation of concerns and testability. - Requires additional boilerplate code compared to MVC. 𝗠𝗩𝗜 (𝗠𝗼𝗱𝗲𝗹-𝗩𝗶𝗲𝘄-𝗜𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗻𝘁): - Built for reactive programming. - View emits intents, handled by the model, updating state and view. - Promotes unidirectional data flow and simplifies UI logic. - May require a steeper learning curve. 𝗠𝗩𝗩𝗠 (𝗠𝗼𝗱𝗲𝗹-𝗩𝗶𝗲𝘄-𝗩𝗶𝗲𝘄𝗠𝗼𝗱𝗲𝗹): - View binds to a ViewModel holding data and display logic. - ViewModel updates by the model, then updates the view. - Well-suited for reactive frameworks and complex UIs. - Requires additional ViewModel setup compared to MVP. 𝗩𝗜𝗣𝗘𝗥 (𝗩𝗶𝗲𝘄, 𝗜𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗮𝗰𝘁𝗼𝗿, 𝗣𝗿𝗲𝘀𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗿, 𝗘𝗻𝘁𝗶𝘁𝘆, 𝗥𝗼𝘂𝘁𝗲𝗿): - Designed for large and complex applications. - Five layers: View, Interactor (business logic), Presenter (data preparation), Entity (data models), Router (data flow coordination). - Enhances modularity and maintainability for massive projects. - Requires meticulous planning and understanding due to its complexity. 𝗖𝗵𝗼𝗼𝘀𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗥𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁 𝗣𝗮𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗻: The optimal pattern depends on various factors, including: - 𝗣𝗿𝗼𝗷𝗲𝗰𝘁 𝘀𝗶𝘇𝗲 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗽𝗹𝗲𝘅𝗶𝘁𝘆: MVC/MVP for simple apps, MVI/MVVM for reactive apps, VIPER for large projects. - 𝗧𝗲𝗮𝗺 𝗲𝘅𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲: Choose a pattern familiar to your team to avoid learning curves. - 𝗣𝗲𝗿𝘀𝗼𝗻𝗮𝗹 𝗽𝗿𝗲𝗳𝗲𝗿𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲: Experiment and find what works best for you and your team. Ultimately, experimenting and finding what works best for you and your team is key. What do you think? Which software architecture pattern is your favorite?

𝗦𝗼𝗳𝘁𝘄𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗔𝗿𝗰𝗵𝗶𝘁𝗲𝗰𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗲 𝗣𝗮𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗻𝘀: 𝗠𝗩𝗖, 𝗠𝗩𝗣, 𝗠𝗩𝗜, 𝗠𝗩𝗩𝗠, 𝗩𝗜𝗣𝗘𝗥 Design patterns are essential tools for any developer, offering a framework for structuring code in a clean, maintainable, and scalable way. Today, we'll delve into five of the most popular design patterns, exploring their strengths and weaknesses to help you choose the right fit for your next project. 𝗠𝗩𝗖 (𝗠𝗼𝗱𝗲𝗹-𝗩𝗶𝗲𝘄-𝗖𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗿𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗲𝗿): - Classic pattern separating code into three layers:     - 𝗠𝗼𝗱𝗲𝗹: Data and business logic     - 𝗩𝗶𝗲𝘄: Presentation of data to the user     - 𝗖𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗿𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗲𝗿: Handles user input and updates model/view - Simple and familiar, but can lead to tightly coupled components in complex applications. 𝗠𝗩𝗣 (𝗠𝗼𝗱𝗲𝗹-𝗩𝗶𝗲𝘄-𝗣𝗿𝗲𝘀𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗿): - Introduces a Presenter to mediate between view and model. - Improves separation of concerns and testability. - Requires additional boilerplate code compared to MVC. 𝗠𝗩𝗜 (𝗠𝗼𝗱𝗲𝗹-𝗩𝗶𝗲𝘄-𝗜𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗻𝘁): - Built for reactive programming. - View emits intents, handled by the model, updating state and view. - Promotes unidirectional data flow and simplifies UI logic. - May require a steeper learning curve. 𝗠𝗩𝗩𝗠 (𝗠𝗼𝗱𝗲𝗹-𝗩𝗶𝗲𝘄-𝗩𝗶𝗲𝘄𝗠𝗼𝗱𝗲𝗹): - View binds to a ViewModel holding data and display logic. - ViewModel updates by the model, then updates the view. - Well-suited for reactive frameworks and complex UIs. - Requires additional ViewModel setup compared to MVP. 𝗩𝗜𝗣𝗘𝗥 (𝗩𝗶𝗲𝘄, 𝗜𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗮𝗰𝘁𝗼𝗿, 𝗣𝗿𝗲𝘀𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗿, 𝗘𝗻𝘁𝗶𝘁𝘆, 𝗥𝗼𝘂𝘁𝗲𝗿): - Designed for large and complex applications. - Five layers: View, Interactor (business logic), Presenter (data preparation), Entity (data models), Router (data flow coordination). - Enhances modularity and maintainability for massive projects. - Requires meticulous planning and understanding due to its complexity. 𝗖𝗵𝗼𝗼𝘀𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗥𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁 𝗣𝗮𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗻: The optimal pattern depends on various factors, including: - 𝗣𝗿𝗼𝗷𝗲𝗰𝘁 𝘀𝗶𝘇𝗲 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗽𝗹𝗲𝘅𝗶𝘁𝘆: MVC/MVP for simple apps, MVI/MVVM for reactive apps, VIPER for large projects. - 𝗧𝗲𝗮𝗺 𝗲𝘅𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲: Choose a pattern familiar to your team to avoid learning curves. - 𝗣𝗲𝗿𝘀𝗼𝗻𝗮𝗹 𝗽𝗿𝗲𝗳𝗲𝗿𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲: Experiment and find what works best for you and your team. Ultimately, experimenting and finding what works best for you and your team is key. What do you think? Which software architecture pattern is your favorite?

𝗦𝗼𝗳𝘁𝘄𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗔𝗿𝗰𝗵𝗶𝘁𝗲𝗰𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗲 𝗣𝗮𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗻𝘀: 𝗠𝗩𝗖, 𝗠𝗩𝗣, 𝗠𝗩𝗜, 𝗠𝗩𝗩𝗠, 𝗩𝗜𝗣𝗘𝗥 Design patterns are essential tools for any developer, offering a framework for structuring code in a clean, maintainable, and scalable way. Today, we'll delve into five of the most popular design patterns, exploring their strengths and weaknesses to help you choose the right fit for your next project. 𝗠𝗩𝗖 (𝗠𝗼𝗱𝗲𝗹-𝗩𝗶𝗲𝘄-𝗖𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗿𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗲𝗿): - Classic pattern separating code into three layers:     - 𝗠𝗼𝗱𝗲𝗹: Data and business logic     - 𝗩𝗶𝗲𝘄: Presentation of data to the user     - 𝗖𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗿𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗲𝗿: Handles user input and updates model/view - Simple and familiar, but can lead to tightly coupled components in complex applications. 𝗠𝗩𝗣 (𝗠𝗼𝗱𝗲𝗹-𝗩𝗶𝗲𝘄-𝗣𝗿𝗲𝘀𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗿): - Introduces a Presenter to mediate between view and model. - Improves separation of concerns and testability. - Requires additional boilerplate code compared to MVC. 𝗠𝗩𝗜 (𝗠𝗼𝗱𝗲𝗹-𝗩𝗶𝗲𝘄-𝗜𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗻𝘁): - Built for reactive programming. - View emits intents, handled by the model, updating state and view. - Promotes unidirectional data flow and simplifies UI logic. - May require a steeper learning curve. 𝗠𝗩𝗩𝗠 (𝗠𝗼𝗱𝗲𝗹-𝗩𝗶𝗲𝘄-𝗩𝗶𝗲𝘄𝗠𝗼𝗱𝗲𝗹): - View binds to a ViewModel holding data and display logic. - ViewModel updates by the model, then updates the view. - Well-suited for reactive frameworks and complex UIs. - Requires additional ViewModel setup compared to MVP. 𝗩𝗜𝗣𝗘𝗥 (𝗩𝗶𝗲𝘄, 𝗜𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗮𝗰𝘁𝗼𝗿, 𝗣𝗿𝗲𝘀𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗿, 𝗘𝗻𝘁𝗶𝘁𝘆, 𝗥𝗼𝘂𝘁𝗲𝗿): - Designed for large and complex applications. - Five layers: View, Interactor (business logic), Presenter (data preparation), Entity (data models), Router (data flow coordination). - Enhances modularity and maintainability for massive projects. - Requires meticulous planning and understanding due to its complexity. 𝗖𝗵𝗼𝗼𝘀𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗥𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁 𝗣𝗮𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗻: The optimal pattern depends on various factors, including: - 𝗣𝗿𝗼𝗷𝗲𝗰𝘁 𝘀𝗶𝘇𝗲 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗽𝗹𝗲𝘅𝗶𝘁𝘆: MVC/MVP for simple apps, MVI/MVVM for reactive apps, VIPER for large projects. - 𝗧𝗲𝗮𝗺 𝗲𝘅𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲: Choose a pattern familiar to your team to avoid learning curves. - 𝗣𝗲𝗿𝘀𝗼𝗻𝗮𝗹 𝗽𝗿𝗲𝗳𝗲𝗿𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲: Experiment and find what works best for you and your team. Ultimately, experimenting and finding what works best for you and your team is key. What do you think? Which software architecture pattern is your favorite?